๐–๐ก๐ž๐ง ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ ๐š๐ซ๐ž ๐š๐›๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฐ๐š๐ฅ๐ค ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐จ ๐š ๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐ž ๐Ÿ๐ข๐ž๐ฅ๐, ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ ๐ฐ๐š๐ง๐ญ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ค๐ง๐จ๐ฐ. 

You want someone 'at your six' to alert you to incoming dangers.

Yet when we are stressed, our bias is for '๐˜ด๐˜ข๐˜ง๐˜ฆ ๐˜ค๐˜ฉ๐˜ฐ๐˜ช๐˜ค๐˜ฆ๐˜ด', we yearn for '๐˜ด๐˜ฎ๐˜ฐ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ ๐˜ด๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ', and we avoid those we see as '๐˜ณ๐˜ฐ๐˜ค๐˜ฌ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ต๐˜ฉ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ฃ๐˜ฐ๐˜ข๐˜ต'.

However, ๐ฐ๐ž ๐๐จ ๐ฌ๐จ ๐š๐ญ ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ๐ข๐ฅ.

Good leaders know that compliance, eagerness to please, and lack of assertiveness ๐š๐ซ๐ž ๐ง๐จ๐ญ character traits that should earn someone a promotion.

Yet, in times of radical change, I've seen leaders, time and again, fall into the trap of allowing their unconscious habits of trying to control the risks to overrule what they know about ๐†๐จ๐จ๐ ๐‹๐ž๐š๐๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ๐ก๐ข๐ฉ. Rather than promoting someone who is willing to disagree with them, and point out the errors of judgement, insight, or fact to them, ... ๐’•๐’‰๐’†๐’š ๐’„๐’‰๐’๐’๐’”๐’† ๐’‚๐’ ๐’†๐’‚๐’”๐’Š๐’†๐’“ ๐’“๐’๐’‚๐’… and promote those that they feel they can more easily influence.

This, in turn, creates ๐š๐ง ๐ž๐ฏ๐ž๐ง ๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐ž ๐๐š๐ง๐ ๐ž๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐ž๐ง๐ฏ๐ข๐ซ๐จ๐ง๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ - as the leader then may feel less resistance from those that they 'lead' when making difficult decisions, but they will also experience less warnings of danger in relation to their decisions.

Specifically, their choice of a 'deputy' that is 'compliant' creates an environment bereft of psychological safety.

As a leader, your choices are on display, and all employees watch you (regardless if you want this or not), comment to each other on your choices, and in the absence of transparency, fill the information vacuum with assumptions.

If your choices for promotions are those that are either 'like you', or that won't question your decisions - the message you are sending is that ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ ๐๐จ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ฏ๐š๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ž ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฉ๐ฌ๐ฒ๐œ๐ก๐จ๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ข๐œ๐š๐ฅ ๐ฌ๐š๐Ÿ๐ž๐ญ๐ฒ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐ž๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฒ๐ž๐ž๐ฌ.

You are creating a culture where people do not feel safe to raise potential risks to the organisation, and definitely don't feel comfortable to raise problems that they see.

But you, as a leader, have the potential to create cultures of transparency; cultures of psychological safety; and a legacy for your own leadership identity, which will create a better world.

Choose the Insightful Path, and choose to promote those people in your organisation that are willing to stand up for others, and point out where they think things are going wrong. It is never too late to work on your legacy. There is always time to make values based decisions.

I hope you choose the Insightful Path. You will be creating a better world if you do.


Previous
Previous

To awakenโ€ฆ

Next
Next

Good bureaucrat v Good public servant