๐๐ก๐๐ง ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ ๐๐ซ๐ ๐๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฐ๐๐ฅ๐ค ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐จ ๐ ๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ข๐๐ฅ๐, ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ ๐ฐ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ค๐ง๐จ๐ฐ.
You want someone 'at your six' to alert you to incoming dangers.
Yet when we are stressed, our bias is for '๐ด๐ข๐ง๐ฆ ๐ค๐ฉ๐ฐ๐ช๐ค๐ฆ๐ด', we yearn for '๐ด๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฉ ๐ด๐ข๐ช๐ญ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ', and we avoid those we see as '๐ณ๐ฐ๐ค๐ฌ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ฃ๐ฐ๐ข๐ต'.
However, ๐ฐ๐ ๐๐จ ๐ฌ๐จ ๐๐ญ ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ฅ.
Good leaders know that compliance, eagerness to please, and lack of assertiveness ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ character traits that should earn someone a promotion.
Yet, in times of radical change, I've seen leaders, time and again, fall into the trap of allowing their unconscious habits of trying to control the risks to overrule what they know about ๐๐จ๐จ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ซ๐ฌ๐ก๐ข๐ฉ. Rather than promoting someone who is willing to disagree with them, and point out the errors of judgement, insight, or fact to them, ... ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ and promote those that they feel they can more easily influence.
This, in turn, creates ๐๐ง ๐๐ฏ๐๐ง ๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐๐๐ง๐ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐๐ง๐ฏ๐ข๐ซ๐จ๐ง๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ - as the leader then may feel less resistance from those that they 'lead' when making difficult decisions, but they will also experience less warnings of danger in relation to their decisions.
Specifically, their choice of a 'deputy' that is 'compliant' creates an environment bereft of psychological safety.
As a leader, your choices are on display, and all employees watch you (regardless if you want this or not), comment to each other on your choices, and in the absence of transparency, fill the information vacuum with assumptions.
If your choices for promotions are those that are either 'like you', or that won't question your decisions - the message you are sending is that ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ ๐๐จ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ฏ๐๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฉ๐ฌ๐ฒ๐๐ก๐จ๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ข๐๐๐ฅ ๐ฌ๐๐๐๐ญ๐ฒ ๐จ๐ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฒ๐๐๐ฌ.
You are creating a culture where people do not feel safe to raise potential risks to the organisation, and definitely don't feel comfortable to raise problems that they see.
But you, as a leader, have the potential to create cultures of transparency; cultures of psychological safety; and a legacy for your own leadership identity, which will create a better world.
Choose the Insightful Path, and choose to promote those people in your organisation that are willing to stand up for others, and point out where they think things are going wrong. It is never too late to work on your legacy. There is always time to make values based decisions.
I hope you choose the Insightful Path. You will be creating a better world if you do.